The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that a San Francisco health care mandate is not preempted by ERISA – the Employee Retirement Income Security Act – in a case that has received national attention and may make its way to the United States Supreme Court.
Why the controversy?
The controversy over this case, Golden Gate Restaurant Assn. vs. City and County of San Francisco, stems from a San Francisco ordinance that requires employers to make certain health care expenditures for every employee as follows:
The Restaurant Association claimed that the ordinance was preempted by ERISA, which precludes state and local governments from enacting laws dictating the contents of employee benefit plans. Even the U.S. Department of Labor filed a brief in the case saying that upholding the city ordinance would "open plan sponsors to a potentially bewildering and conflicting array of mandates." However, the court held that San Francisco’s ordinance was not an employee benefit plan and therefore was not preempted. According to news reports, the case may make its way to the United States Supreme Court for clarification on the definition of employee benefit plan.
What are employee benefit plans?
Currently under ERISA, employee benefits plans include employee pension benefits plans and employee welfare benefits plans which are defined as:
Why are these definitions important? If you’ve been denied benefits under a plan that is subject to ERISA, then there are specific procedures you must follow to protest the denial. An ERISA attorney can explain the process, what’s required and how long it might take.