How does the Supreme Court decide to hear a case?

The U.S. Supreme Court decides to hear a case based on at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agreeing to grant the Petition for Certiorari. If four Justices agree to grant the petition, the Supreme Court will consider the case. A Petition for Certiorari is granted in very, few selected cases, fewer than 100 a year, by the Supreme Court of the United States.

What is a petition for Writ of Certiorari?

A petition for Writ of Certiorari is a request that the court hear oral arguments in your case. The Supreme Court receives over 5000 writs of Certiorari every year. Each writ and the case it comes from is reviewed by the Supreme Court clerks and then shortened into a cert. memo upon review. The cert. memo is what the Supreme Court justices use to actually make a decision on whether to hear arguments in the case.

Upon review of the memo, the particular justice that the case was assigned to will either deny the appeal himself and affirm the appeals court judgment or will bring the cert. memo before the other justices and debate whether the case should be heard.

What needs to happen for your case to be heard by the Supreme Court?

In order for the case to be heard, four justices must agree to hear the case. This is known as the Rule of Four. If four justices vote to hear the case, then the court grants certiorari and it is placed onto the court’s docket. Then the parties and their attorneys are notified that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

The court will typically grant the petitions of cases that are exceptionally unique and that present an issue of law or constitutional issues that would be considered far-reaching throughout the United States. The Supreme Court also prefers cases that are clear examples for the lower courts so that exact guidance can be given.

Case Studies: How the Supreme Court Decides to Hear a Case

Case Study 1: The Rule of Four in Action

A group of individuals filed a petition for the Supreme Court to hear their case involving a constitutional challenge. The petition went through a rigorous review process by the Supreme Court clerks, who prepared a cert. memo summarizing the case.

The cert. memo was presented to the justices, and after thorough deliberation, four of the nine justices agreed to hear the case. This case study demonstrates how the Rule of Four plays a crucial role in the Supreme Court’s decision-making process.

Case Study 2: The Importance of Exceptional Cases

John Adams, a legal scholar, filed a petition for Writ of Certiorari seeking the Supreme Court’s review of a case that had far-reaching implications for constitutional law. The case presented a unique legal issue that had not been definitively addressed by lower courts.

The Supreme Court, recognizing the exceptional nature of the case and the need for guidance, granted certiorari. This case study underscores the Supreme Court’s preference for cases that have significant legal or constitutional implications.

Case Study 3: Deliberation and Final Decision

Sarah Thompson, an attorney, submitted a petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court. The cert. memo prepared by the Supreme Court clerks highlighted the key arguments and legal issues in Sarah’s case. The justices reviewed the memo and engaged in a discussion about whether to grant certiorari.

Ultimately, four justices agreed that the case warranted further consideration, and the Court granted certiorari. This case study emphasizes the deliberative nature of the Supreme Court’s decision-making process.