What are typical stages in a matter that goes to litigation?
UPDATED: February 20, 2013
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right legal decisions.
We strive to help you make confident law decisions. Finding trusted and reliable legal advice should be easy. This doesn't influence our content. Our opinions are our own.
THE LAWYERS LETTER -- If the principals cant work things out among themselves, one party usually has an attorney send a "lawyers letter". While there may not be any legal significance to a lawyers letter, it usually gets a serious response from the other side, which may have been ignoring you. In some states it is necessary to make a formal demand before you can file suit, and the lawyers letter should do that for you.
THE PRE-LITIGATION SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS --There often is an informal "pre-litigation settlement discussion" involving the parties and their lawyers. Sometimes all it takes is a letter and phone call to straighten things out, particularly if the other side sees that you are serious.
FORMAL SUIT OR DEMAND FOR ARBITRATION -- If the informal attempts at resolution fail, formal action may be started, either by "filing suit" or a "demand for arbitration". The formal litigation is underway. There are strict time limits requiring that actions be taken within a set time frame or your right to sue may be barred by the "statute of limitations".
THE ANSWER Once the other party is "served" with legal process, it must provide its formal "Answer" within a prescribed time frame, or "default" and lose its case.
DISCOVERY -- Litigation may involve "pre-trial discovery" in which one or both parties attempt to get evidence as to what happened, perhaps by taking the testimony of witnesses, or examining documents or physical evidence.
MOTIONS -- In litigation either side may make "motions" to try to narrow the issues, or compel the other side to do something, or even to have the court or arbitrator decide the matter without the need for a trial, as if all the facts are agreed to and only the application of the law to the facts is at issue.
JUDGES PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE -- Before a trial the court or (in a large case) the arbitrator will typically order a "pre-trial conference" to narrow issues down still further, and perhaps to get the parties to agree to a settlement.
THE TRIAL -- Then comes the "trial", either by a judge alone, or with a jury to decide the facts and the judge to decide the law. In arbitration the "trial" is called a "hearing". By the way, despite the OJ trials, most trials are relatively dull, and only the parties, their attorneys, the witnesses and the judge and jury are present.
THE JUDGMENT -- After the trial the court will "enter judgment" such as "The plaintiff is entitled to recover $15,420." In an arbitration the arbitrator will issue an "award" and the victorious party will go to court for "confirmation of the award".
POST TRIAL MOTIONS AND APPEALS -- There may be "post-trial motions" in which the losing party tries to convince the original judge that something else is appropriate, perhaps more money, or added relief. After that, there may be an appeal by the losing party to a higher court. An arbitration award is much more difficult to appeal than a courts decision.
COLLECTING THE JUDGMENT -- The victorious party may have received a judgment stating what he or she is entitled to recover. Then it is his or her job to collect the "judgment". Collecting judgments can be difficult, especially if the defendants assets are not easily located, or exempt from claims of creditors, as everyone is learning from the OJ civil case.